Tauzin-Dingell Clearinghouse

 

Ohio Internet Service Providers

http://www.oispa.org/ Association

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

The OISPA opposes HR 1542 -- the "Internet Freedom and Broadband

Deployment Act of 2001".

Friday, April 27, 2001 - The following statement is from Barry Hassler, President of the

Ohio Internet Service Providers Association (OISPA). OISPA is an Internet trade

association number over fifty independent Ohio based Internet Providers.

On behalf of the Ohio Internet Service Providers Association, OISPA, I would like to

express our opposition to the 'Internet Freedom and Broadband Deployment Act of 2001'

(107 Congress, H.R. 1542) introduced by Rep. Billy Tauzin (R-LA). and Rep. John Dingell

(D-MI).

 

The bill proposes to eliminate regulation, imposed at the federal and state level, of

Internet services and access facilities. This regulation, the bill purports, came as a

result of misinterpretation or overzealous interpretation by federal and state agencies

of certain provisions of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 by which the agencies could

require of the incumbent Bell Operating Companies, the BOCs, an opening of local service,

including high-speed service, to competition through such means as access to wholesale

rates on facilities, fair terms on contracts, availability to network equipment for

provisioning, and standards for seeing that business and technical problems which arise

between the BOC and their customers and prospective competitors were handled in a fair

and timely manner. Although the bill does not show a connection, it claims that the

regulation harms the public by reducing their access to and choice in Internet providing

services, most especially high-speed service. Eliminating the regulation imposed on the

BOCs would, the bill claims, provide market incentives for the rapid delivery of high-speed

services to the public and to the Internet Service Providers, the ISPs, who would

deliver those services.

 

The bill is cleverly framed, but misleading. The BOCs have a monopoly on local

telecommunications facilities. Facilities are not the only aspect needed to deliver

Internet service, but they are an essential one. The public benefits from fair

competition. Fair competition in all aspects of Internet service, including facilities,

will bring the greatest benefit to the public. The bill gives incentive to whom needs it

least. Even under the current regulatory framework, ISPs and BOC competitors have

struggled with the BOCs on issues promoting fair competition. With the regulation

oversight eliminated, the BOCs will again have a free hand over issues of service, cost,

and access -- erasing the very aims of the Telecommunications Act of 1996.

 

And the trouble does not end with that. By dictating service availability, cost and

quality, the BOCs will leverage ownership of facilities into ownership of Internet

providing services. This is unfair competition. Eliminating the regulation eliminates the

competition in local telecommunications. And like consumers, ISPs lose out. Locally owned

and operated ISPs have been critical in enabling people and businesses make good use of

the Internet. We have fought and will continue to fight the BOCs for delivery of services

to our customers. We deliver a wider variety of Internet services, we delivery them more

affordably, and we support them better than the BOCs ever could. We have played an

important role in the development of the Internet; we believe we need to continue to play

an important role in its future, if the public is to be best served. What we ask is a

legislative and regulatory environment which promotes competition in all aspects of

Internet service, especially in telecommunications facilities where competition is most

needed.

 

Deregulation is often a good thing. But if you deregulate a monopoly, you create a bigger

monopoly. Before throwing out the rule book, level the playing field and maintain the safeguards which foster competition. The Ohio Internet Service Provider Association urges

Congress reject the 'Internet Freedom and Broadband Deployment Act of 2001'.

For further information, contact:

Barry D. Hassler, President

937-427-9000

barry.hassler@hcst.com

Ed Taylor, President Elect

740-695-2280 x3072

ed@1st.net